首頁 - 范文案例 > Essay代寫范文-UK National Minimum Wage

Essay代寫范文-UK National Minimum Wage

發布于:2020-12-03 作者:yaya 閱讀:1909
導讀: 本文是一篇essay代寫范文,題目為UKNationalMinimumWage,本文主要討論了英國國家最低工資水平。全國最低工資(NMW)介紹了在英國19...

本文是一篇essay代寫范文,題目為UK National Minimum Wage,本文主要討論了英國國家最低工資水平。全國最低工資(NMW)介紹了在英國1999年的目標,幫助許多低收入工人盡可能無任何重大不良影響通脹或就業。這篇文章將探討最低工資應高于目前的水平£5.80市場競爭作為一種工具使用供求結構。對英國經濟的最低工資的影響將進行調查,并與1999年的最低工資在原來的目標相比。

timg (12).jpg

The UK National Minimum Wage is currently set at less than 50 per cent of median earnings. Should it be set higher?


论文代写等留学生作业代做服务,北美网课代修领导者AssignmentBackThe National Minimum Wage (NMW) was introduced in the UK in 1999, with the goal of helping “as many low-paid workers as possible without any significant adverse impacts on inflation or employment” (Low Pay Commission, 2006) This essay will explore whether the minimum wage should be higher than its current level of £5.80 using the demand-supply framework in a competitive market as a tool. The impact of the minimum wage on the UK economy will be investigated, and compared against the original goals of the minimum wage back in 1999.


The central argument for a NMW is that it protects low paid workers from exploitation. It is “rooted in concern about the ability of markets to provide income equity for the least able members of the work force” (Eatwell et all, 1987). Whilst there is general consensus that socially and morally the NMW is a good thing, the economic benefits versus drawbacks have been vigorously debated for years. The principle argument against is that setting a NMW above the equilibrium point of the demand and supply curves (essential for a NMW to be effective) in a competitive market will cause unemployment through an increase in the supply of labour (because workers are incentivised by higher wages) and decrease in the demand for labour (because firms cannot afford to pay for the same volume of labour as before). One crucial point is that the equilibrium point (and the corresponding supply and demand curves) relates to each worker, and their employability, and therefore there is no one equilibrium point that holds for the market.


There is no one accepted definition of what low pay is, or indeed what the level of the minimum wage should be. At the upper limit, the Council of Europe defines a so called ‘decency threshold' that originally was 2/3 of the mean wage level (Council of Europe, 2008). This has now been revised down to 60% of net earnings. This would give a NMW in the UK of between £8.17 and £9.00 (40-55% higher than the current £5.80 level). As a result of this up to 38% of full-time workers would have their wages improved (Sloman and Hinde). If the NMW was set at 2/3 of median male earnings rather than mean wages, this would lead to a NMW of £7.50, and positively impact 20% of men and 40% of women. (Sloman and Hinde, 2007)

论文代写等留学生作业代做服务,北美网课代修领导者AssignmentBackRegardless of which measure is chosen to compare the NMW to average (mean, median, full-time male etc), it is clear that the UK NMW is someway off the 60-67% of ‘average' earnings suggested as appropriate. On the flipside, the Low Pay Commission has recommended (and had accepted) above average earnings rises in the minimum wage over the past 10 years (Low Pay Commission, 2009).

A minimum wage acts as a “classical price floor on labour” (Ehrenberg and Smith, 1994). It goes on to explain that “if set above the equilibrium price, more labor will be willing to be provided by workers than will be demanded by employers” The result is “a surplus of the commodity” and this “takes the form of unemployment, which tends to be higher with minimum wage laws than without them” (Sowell, 2007).

It is clear from the above diagram that in a competitive market, setting a minimum wage above the equilibrium rate, leads to deadweight welfare loss. The consumer (employer) surplus must decrease, while producer (employee) surplus may or may not increase; however the decrease in consumer surplus must be greater than the increase in producer surplus

论文代写等留学生作业代做服务,北美网课代修领导者AssignmentBackBack in 1946, Stigler argued (Stigler, 1946) that “a rise in the minimum wage leads perfectly competitive employers to cut employment”. The level of the NMW is not the sole factor determining the size of this employment gap. The elasticity of price for a sectors goods has an impact as well (Sloman and Hinde). Since the NMW applies to the sector as a whole, and not an individual firm, this elasticity effect is attenuated, and the potential unemployment in any one firm minimized. Additional complications such as replacing staff with machines, or overseas threats, serve to ensure that the NMW has the potential to cause unemployment in some sectors prone to these 2 cost reduction techniques.

Under monopsonistic competition, in which the employer has “some influence over rates of pay (Sloman and Hinde), an “appropriately set minimum wage could increase both wages and employment, with the optimal level being equal to the marginal productivity of labor” (Manning, 2003). In this sense, the NMW is seen from the perspective of being a “market regulation policy akin to antitrust policies, as opposed to an illusory "free lunch" for low wage workers” (Manning, 2003) . Dickens et al (Dickens, Machin and Manning, 1999) propose that a modern monopsonistic framework, less based on unrealistic company town concepts, and more on “labor market frictions” could explain the (neoclassically) anomalous neutral/positive employment impacts caused by the introduction of a NMW. They studied the ‘Wage Councils' in the UK, the forerunner to the UK NMW, and found that such firms potentially have a “degree of monopsony power” (Dickens, Machin and Manning, 1999) because those that cut wages “do not instantaneously lose all their workers, so the supply of labor to a firm is not perfectly elastic”. They found that “irrespective of specification and data definition, the effect of minimum wages on employment is always estimated to be nonnegative and in many cases to be positive”. They do add a word of caution, however, that if the NMW was set “high enough”, their theoretical framework could lead to negative results.

Blinder (Blinder, 1996) argues that an increased NMW encourages employees to stay, thus reducing turnover and training costs (associated with new employees). It could also “render moot” (Blinder, 1996) the potential problem of recruiting workers at a higher wage than current workers. He further argues that minimum workers may be such a small part of a businesses cost that it doesn't matter. Whilst these are not proven points, they could explain part of the reason why the NMW has not had a negative impact on the UK economy as a whole.

Contrary to initial concern, and possibly as a result of the deliberately cautious (Low Pay Commission, 2009) initial £3.60 rate; there has been little evidence that the NMW has had a negative economic impact. Research by the Low Pay Commission has found that employers may have “reduced their rate of hiring, reduced staff hours, increased prices, and have found ways to cause current workers to be more productive (especially service companies)” (Low Pay Commission, 2005)

论文代写等留学生作业代做服务,北美网课代修领导者AssignmentBackResearch in the US by Card and Krueger (Card and Krueger, 1994) (Card and Krueger, 1995) showed that increases in the minimum wage actually increased employment. This result was supported by Krugman (Krugman, 2007) and Stiglitz (Stiglitz, 2002), but vehemently opposed by Murphy, Mankiv (Mankiw, 1999) and Becker (Becker, 1995).

论文代写等留学生作业代做服务,北美网课代修领导者AssignmentBackIn the UK, Machin et al (Machin, Manning and Rahman, 2003) demonstrated that the “current evidence on the employment effects of the National Minimum Wage suggests that these effects (employment and hours reduction) have been small or non-existent, whilst Stewart (Stewart, 2004) showed “there to have been no reduction in the employment probabilities of minimum wage workers as compared to workers slightly higher up the wage distribution”.

论文代写等留学生作业代做服务,北美网课代修领导者AssignmentBackThe Low Pay Commission in their 2009 commission report (Low Pay Commission, 2009) assert that the NMW continues to exert “significant influence on wages at the bottom of the earnings distribution” whilst “firms appear to have adapted to these increases in wage costs by changing pay structures, removing wage premia, and reducing non-wage costs” This would suggest that the NMW is achieving its goals of benefiting low paid workers, whilst having a “benign influence on the economy” (Low Pay Commission, 2009)

论文代写等留学生作业代做服务,北美网课代修领导者AssignmentBackThe efficiency hypothesis states that “the productivity of workers rise as the wage rates rise” (Sloman and Hinde, 2007) Therefore the introduction of a NMW should improve workers, and firms, productivity. However, however empirical studies in the UK (Low Pay Commission, 2009) have found no evidence for this to be true.

Draca et al (Draca, Machin and Reenen, 2005) showed that wage increases were not passed onto consumers as price increases, and therefore profitability was “significantly” affected by the introduction of the NMW in the UK. They also observed, however, that few firms had gone out of business, and suggested that the effect of the NMW was to ‘moderate these excess profits by channeling them back to the wages of low paid workers'(Draca, Machin and Reenen, 2005)

Since the introduction of the minimum wage in the UK in 1999, the level has risen against median earnings year on year. The low pay commission has sought to exhibit a “cautious approach” (Low Pay Commission, 2009) during times of uncertainty, whilst increasing it faster than the average wage during economically stable periods, and thus improving the “effective level of the minimum wage” (Low Pay Commission, 2009). Studies on the impact of the NMW, both in the UK (Machin, Manning and Rahman, 2003) (Stewart, 2004), and the US (Card and Krueger, 1994) (Card and Krueger, 1995) have shown neutral to positive employment probability impacts of the NMW, negligible consumer product prices rises with a reduction in firm profitability (Draca, Machin and Reenen, 2005). At the same time, a significant number of workers have benefitted (Low Pay Commission, 2009) (Dickens and Manning, 2004). However, this picture must be considered against the backdrop of a buoyant economy and increasing labour market flexibility between 1999 and 2007 (Sloman and Hinde). Since 2007 there has been “relative economic uncertainty” (Low Pay Commission, 2009), and the Low Pay Commission has recommended a more “modest increase” (Low Pay Commission, 2009) this year of 7 pence taking the adult NMW to £5.80. In light of the data showing a year on year fall in aggregate employment in 2008 (Low Pay Commission, 2009), combined with studies showing that whilst small rises in NMW appear to have a relatively benign economic impact (Stewart, 2004), increasing the NMW outside its “range of indeterminacy (Sloman and Hinde, 2007) to the levels suggested by the Council of Europe (Council of Europe, 2008) , may well lead to the negative employment and inflation impacts predicted in the literature (Mankiw, 1999) (Becker, 1995). An increase in the NMW is, therefore, currently not recommended.

References 參考文獻


(Blinder, 1996) Alan S. Blinder, "The $5.15 Question," The New York Times, 23 May 1996, p. A29.

论文代写等留学生作业代做服务,北美网课代修领导者AssignmentBack(Card and Krueger, 1994) David Card and Alan B. Krueger, "Minimum Wages and Employment: A Case Study of the FastFood Industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania," American Economic Review, Volume 84, no. 4 (September 1994), pp. 774775.

(Card and Krueger, 1995) Card, D. and Krueger, A. 1995 Myth and Measurement: The New Economics of the Minimum Wage. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

论文代写等留学生作业代做服务,北美网课代修领导者AssignmentBack(Council of Europe, 2008) Council of Europe, DIGEST OF THE CASE LAW OF THE EUROPEAN COMMITTEE OF SOCIAL RIGHTS, 1st Sept 2008

(Dickens and Manning, 2004) Dickens, R. and A. Manning (2004) "Spikes and Spill-overs: The Impact of the National Minimum Wage on the Wage Distribution in a Low-Wage Sector", Economic Journal. Vol. 114, No. 49.

(Dickens, Machin and Manning, 1999) Dickens, Richard, Stephen Machin and Alan Manning (1999): "The Effects of Minimum Wages on Employment: Theory and Evidence from Britain", Journal of Labor Economics, 17(1), 1-22.

(Draca, Machin and Reenen, 2005) Draca, Mirko, Stephen Machin and John Van Reenen (2005): "The Impact of the National Minimum Wage on Profits and Prices: Report for Low Pay Commission", February.

(Eatwell et all, 1987) Eatwell, John, Ed.; Murray Milgate, Peter Newman (1987). The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics. London: The Macmillan Press Limited. pp. 476-478. ISBN 0333372352

(Ehrenberg and Smith, 1994) Ehrenberg, R. and Smith, R. "Modern labor economics: theory and public policy", HarperCollins, 1994, 5th ed.

(Krugman, 2007) Paul Krugman, The conscience of a liberal (W.W. Norton & Co., 2007)

论文代写等留学生作业代做服务,北美网课代修领导者AssignmentBack(Low Pay Commission, 2005) Low Pay Commission (2005). National Minimum Wage Low Pay Commission Report 2005

(Low Pay Commission, 2006) - From Low Pay Commission

论文代写等留学生作业代做服务,北美网课代修领导者AssignmentBack(Low Pay Commission, 2009) National Minimum Wage - Low Pay Commission Report 2009

(Machin, Manning and Rahman, 2003) Stephen Machin; Alan Manning; Lupin Rahman, "Where the Minimum Wage Bites Hard: Introduction of Minimum Wages to a Low Wage Sector "Journal of the European Economic Association, Vol. 1, No. 1 (Mar., 2003), pp. 154-180

论文代写等留学生作业代做服务,北美网课代修领导者AssignmentBack(Mankiw, 1999) Mankiw

论文代写等留学生作业代做服务,北美网课代修领导者AssignmentBack(Manning, 2003) Manning, Alan (2003). Monopsony in motion: Imperfect Competition in Labor Markets. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN 0691113122

(Mason, 2009) Adapted from Robin Masons BEMM734 Lecture notes

论文代写等留学生作业代做服务,北美网课代修领导者AssignmentBack(Sloman and Hinde, 2007) Sloman, John and Kevin Hinde, Economics for Business, ISBN 0273709089. p382-384

论文代写等留学生作业代做服务,北美网课代修领导者AssignmentBack(Sowell, 2007) Sowell, Thomas (20070402). Basic Economics (3rd Edition): A Common Sense Guide to the Economy

论文代写等留学生作业代做服务,北美网课代修领导者AssignmentBack(Stewart, 2004) Stewart, Mark (2004) 'The Impact of the Introduction of the UK Minimum Wage on the Employment Probabilities of Low Wage Workers', Journal of the European Economic Association, 2, 67-97.

论文代写等留学生作业代做服务,北美网课代修领导者AssignmentBack(Stigler, 1946) Stigler, G. 1946. The economics of minimum wage legislation. American Economic Review 36: 358-365.

论文代写等留学生作业代做服务,北美网课代修领导者AssignmentBack(Stiglitz, 2002) Joseph Stiglitz. Employment, social justice and societal wellbeing , International Labour Review, 141 (12), p. 929.







  • Assignment代寫的效益評估


    论文代写等留学生作业代做服务,北美网课代修领导者AssignmentBack 有關assignment代寫這一件事,在留學圈中早已不再是什么秘密了。對于大多數留學生而言是可以接受的,當然了,也會有一小部分的同學依然對代寫這件事很排斥。在小...


  • 留學生Essay代寫價格為何如此昂貴?


    论文代写等留学生作业代做服务,北美网课代修领导者AssignmentBack 做為留學生,想必大家都很清楚。國外各種高等院校針對學術研究剽竊是零容忍的。不論是essay,assignment,亦或是paper等諸多種類的出國academicessays代寫,都務...


  • 留學生作業代寫能提供哪些學術服務?


    论文代写等留学生作业代做服务,北美网课代修领导者AssignmentBack 2021越來越多的留學生開始面臨作業難完成的問題,確實國外的作業不比國內,往往不僅僅是口語表達的問題,更多的還是思維的不同,這也導致很多留學生不能畢業,尤其是在...


  • 撰寫academicessays代寫你需要明確的那些要點


    论文代写等留学生作业代做服务,北美网课代修领导者AssignmentBack 撰寫academicessays代寫的質量還取決于行為主體一部分,如果這些都能夠創作的非常好,大家真實在關心掌握的情況下就應當看一下怎么樣才可以寫的更強,學術研究academicessays代寫的格式實際上要...


  • 有必要找留學生作業輔導嗎?


    论文代写等留学生作业代做服务,北美网课代修领导者AssignmentBack 留學生作業分數的高低很大程度上取決于自身的英語水平。一些留學生自身的英語水平不過關,而academicessays代寫動輒好幾千字,根本不可能取得一個滿意的成績。通過academicessays代寫輔導,可以...


  • 留學生Essay代寫為何會被查?







北美最专业的线上写作专家:网课代修,网课代做,CS代写,程序代写 代码代写,CS编程代写,java代写北美最好的一站式学术代写服务机构 美国essay代写,作业代写,✔美国网课代上-最靠谱最低价 美国代写服务,作业代写,CS编程代写,java代写,python代写,c++/c代写 代写essay,作业代写,金融代写,business代写-留学生代写平台 北美代写,美国作业代写,网课代修,Assignment代写-100%原创 北美作业代写,【essay代写】,作业【assignment代写】,网课代上代考 英国作业代写,代写英文,英文论文润色代考价格-论文代写高质量平台 essay代写,英文论文代写,网课代修-地表最专业的留学生代写平台 英国作业代写,✔美国代考,【assignment代写】,business代写